Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JBjb4321's avatar

Very cool. Brings to mind a study I read some time back that showed that in what would look locally as a violation of the second principle, dissipative structures maximise dissipation in their surrounding (evolving it towards equilibrium) BUT they often evolve to maintain as a high a disequilibrium as possible within themselves. The free energy in the gradient is used by loops that use it to keep looping more. Or let's say, the loops that "figured out" how to do that are those that crowd out the other ones.

Is it me or the piece evolves from an ontology that co-evolves with its surrounding (as in, two-way interaction), towards an ontology that focusses on the loop itself, as if it needed no surrounding to exist?

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts